It has been confirmed that there will be standalone Star Wars
movies focusing on specific, already established individual characters
from the saga. It has been rumored that one of them will be about Boba Fett, which wouldn't surprise me at all considering how popular the
character is.
If there is a standalone Boba Fett movie and Temuera Morrison plays him or does his voice, I'll probably hate it. I absolutely hated that they re-dubbed Fett's voice with Morrison's on the Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back DVD in 2004.
But if there was an official feature length live-action Lucasfilm movie where Breckin Meyer played the Robot Chicken version of Fett, I would watch the hell out of that.
I'm not sure what that says about me.
The Death Of "Superman Lives"
Between 1987's Superman IV: The Quest For Peace and 2006's Superman Returns, there were several unsuccessful attempts to create another live-action Superman movie. In the late 90's, filmmaker Tim Burton was going to make one called Superman Lives (originally Superman Reborn) with Nicolas Cage in the titular role. Jon Peters was producing, and both Kevin Smith and Wesley Strick were hired to write scripts. I was probably eleven or twelve years old at the time this movie was in pre-production, and I remember my friends and I talking about it at school during lunch or recess or whatever. I remember I thought it was weird that Nicolas Cage was playing Superman, but being a big fan of Tim Burton's Batman and Batman Returns, and a fan of The Death Of Superman storyline (I never read the comics, but I had read the novel when I was younger), I was interested in the movie.
The movie never ended up getting made, but if it had, it would have been the weirdest Superman movie ever made. Now all that exists instead is various artifacts of the production. There is Smith's screenplay, concept art for the movie, some photos of costumes, including ones of Cage actually wearing them. The costumes kind of resemble the the style of the Burton era Batman costumes, with the rubber sculpted muscles. Here are a couple of photos.
There are also stories, like the wildly entertaining one Kevin Smith tells about his experience working on the movie, specifically working with Jon Peters, who wanted, among other things, a flightless Superman, a giant spider, and Brainiac fighting polar bears. These artifacts are pretty much all that exists, and they're scattered across the internet.
Jon Schnepp has been collecting all of these artifacts for years, and if it gets funded, will be working on a documentary called The Death Of "Superman Lives": What Happened? which compiles all of these little bits into one place for people to see. Besides that, he will be interviewing as many people as he can who were involved in the movie, including everyone I named in the first paragraph of this post. Although there have been stories about what Peters wanted in the movie, it could be really interesting to hear his thoughts coming straight from the man himself. I'd also love to hear whatever Burton and Cage have to say about the movie. Burton heard about this documentary recently and said that it "might be more interesting" than the actual finished movie would have been. I imagine Cage would have a lot to say too, considering he loves the character of Superman. He even named his son Kal-El, which is Superman's Kryptonian name.
Schnepp set up a Kickstarter page for funding the documentary, so check that out if it's something you'd like to help fund. There are currently 36 days left until the deadline, and it's funded a little over halfway. There's also a stretch goal of another $50k, and if that is reached, Schnepp also wants to film scenes from the script the way he thinks Burton would have in 1998, which could be fascinating. There's a video introduction for the Kickstarter which you can watch on the page, or watch below.
The movie never ended up getting made, but if it had, it would have been the weirdest Superman movie ever made. Now all that exists instead is various artifacts of the production. There is Smith's screenplay, concept art for the movie, some photos of costumes, including ones of Cage actually wearing them. The costumes kind of resemble the the style of the Burton era Batman costumes, with the rubber sculpted muscles. Here are a couple of photos.
There are also stories, like the wildly entertaining one Kevin Smith tells about his experience working on the movie, specifically working with Jon Peters, who wanted, among other things, a flightless Superman, a giant spider, and Brainiac fighting polar bears. These artifacts are pretty much all that exists, and they're scattered across the internet.
Jon Schnepp has been collecting all of these artifacts for years, and if it gets funded, will be working on a documentary called The Death Of "Superman Lives": What Happened? which compiles all of these little bits into one place for people to see. Besides that, he will be interviewing as many people as he can who were involved in the movie, including everyone I named in the first paragraph of this post. Although there have been stories about what Peters wanted in the movie, it could be really interesting to hear his thoughts coming straight from the man himself. I'd also love to hear whatever Burton and Cage have to say about the movie. Burton heard about this documentary recently and said that it "might be more interesting" than the actual finished movie would have been. I imagine Cage would have a lot to say too, considering he loves the character of Superman. He even named his son Kal-El, which is Superman's Kryptonian name.
Schnepp set up a Kickstarter page for funding the documentary, so check that out if it's something you'd like to help fund. There are currently 36 days left until the deadline, and it's funded a little over halfway. There's also a stretch goal of another $50k, and if that is reached, Schnepp also wants to film scenes from the script the way he thinks Burton would have in 1998, which could be fascinating. There's a video introduction for the Kickstarter which you can watch on the page, or watch below.
Helen McCrory and Judi Dench in Skyfall
I saw Skyfall. I made a post a while back after Helen McCrory was cast in the movie about how she would be perfect as a younger version of Judi Dench's character M. It turns out they did not play the same character, but they did have a scene together. It was actually distracting how similar they looked and sounded. I wonder if anyone on set noticed or pointed it out. Having them in a movie together and not playing the same character at different ages is sort of like if Michelle Pfeiffer and Chloë Grace Moretz were cast in a movie together and didn't play mother and daughter.
I did like Skyfall though.
I did like Skyfall though.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
On December 15th, I saw The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey with some friends of mine. I know it has been over a month since I've seen the movie, so this is a pretty late post. Get off my back. I'm not a professional blogger. (Not with that attitude! Am I right?)
When I met some of my friends at the mall before the movie, one of them pulled fake Lembas from her bag and handed it to each of us. I was speechless. For those that don’t know, Lembas is a kind of bread made by the elves in Middle Earth, which is preserved in a wrapper of leaves. In The Fellowship Of The Ring, it was given by the elves of Lothlórien to the members of the fellowship. My friend said she didn’t have time to make any of the bread, but the fake leaves folded and tied into a little package are plenty awesome on their own. It made the experience of going to see The Hobbit with a group of friends even more special than it would have been, and it was already something special. I have some cool friends. I found a nice place for the Lembas bread on my movie shelf, next to my Legolas action figure.
As for the movie, I said in my previous post that we were planning on seeing the movie in high frame rate (48 fps) 3D, and that's what we did. I've never gotten a headache or felt motion sickness while watching a 3D movie, and this wasn't any different. I know Peter Jackson has said the high frame rate just takes some getting used to, and in my experience, he was exactly right. It did look a little strange in the beginning while Bilbo was in Bag End, but once he got into the story about Erebor a few minutes later, I was so immersed into the movie, I had forgotten all about the high frame rate. By the next time I remembered, I was already completely used to it. I thought it looked great, and I didn't think it lacked a cinematic look at all. The "cinematic look" has evolved a lot since the beginning of cinema, and will continue to evolve. Since the beginning there have been higher frame rates, color photography, digital photography, etc. I'm sure when a lot of people originally saw a color movie, they also thought it lacked the cinematic look they were used to.
There were many new additions and changes to the story. Having seen Peter Jackson's The Lord Of The Rings trilogy, I completely expected that going in. I was fine with the majority of them, especially since I got to see the White Council. When you're watching an adaptation of a book, you also have to expect that things won't look exactly like you pictured them when you read the book. That said, I really disliked how some things were portrayed, especially the look of most of the dwarves, and the goblin king. They were so far from how I pictured them, and would have been so much better if they were how I imagined them while reading the book. That's fine though. I don't let stuff like that ruin a whole movie for me, and there were plenty of wonderful things to make up for those problems.
One of those wonderful things is Martin Freeman's performance as Bilbo Baggins. I've mentioned several times before how perfect he was for the role. Now that I've actually seen it, I can definitely say I was not at all wrong. I am not a believer in destiny, but it feels like he was born to play Bilbo, and from what I've seen so far, he's done a truly amazing job.
Another one of those wonderful things is the riddles in the dark scene, which was absolutely brilliant. (Following some very abstract thoughts, there will be what some people might call spoilers in this paragraph, so if you don't want anything spoiled, skip to the next paragraph.) Just like my friend making what was already a great trip to the movies into something more special with her Lembas bread, the filmmakers took what is the most iconic, and arguably best part of the book, and in my opinion, made it into something even more special. The riddles in the dark scene in the movie perfectly illustrates what it is about the concept of adaptations that excites me so much. I guess it's all about potential. Although trying to follow the source material is generally the way to go, I think there is room for interpretation and certain enhancements that can make a scene or a character better, as long as the filmmakers recognize that potential. For this scene, all of that potential was recognized and met, which although rare in film adaptations, is a really wonderful thing to experience when it does happen. The advancements in performance capture technology since The Return Of The King nine years ago are astounding. You can see so many more subtle details of Andy Serkis' performance in Gollum's face, and it made me appreciate him as an actor even more than I already did. I also loved the characterization of Gollum in the scene. The interpretation of Gollum in Jackson's movies where he has a split personality allowed for some really entertaining dialogue in this scene between Gollum and Bilbo, and I also loved how childlike Gollum can be at times. There was this wonderful little detail in the scene where Gollum is listening intently to Bilbo and rests his head on a rock. It was easily my favorite part of the entire movie.
I'm sad that Gollum might not show up again in the next two movies, considering he didn't show up again in the book after Bilbo escaped the Misty Mountains, but I'm looking forward to seeing The Desolation Of Smaug and There And Back Again anyway.
After the movie, my friends and I went to Denny's for a Hobbit-themed meal. I had the Hobbit Hole Breakfast and Bilbo's Berry Smoothie. The food was delicious, and we made several nerdy puns. ("Were those onion rings deep-forged in the fires of Mount Doom?") When you're paying for your meal, they also give you a pack containing two collectable cards. I got Kili and limited edition Gandalf.
In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit.
This weekend is Hobbit weekend. Some friends and I will be seeing The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey on Saturday and then we'll be going to Denny's to have a nice meal from the Hobbit-themed menu. Second breakfast perhaps.
I'm a pretty big fan of Peter Jackson's Lord Of The Rings trilogy, and I'm also a big fan of the book The Hobbit, so ever since seeing the trilogy, I've been wanting Jackson to make a movie of The Hobbit. Although I'm sure it would have been very interesting to see Guillermo del Toro's version, I was also glad that Jackson stepped in for the job when del Toro left the project, since he was the one I originally wanted to direct it.
I'm so excited about seeing Martin Freeman play the hobbit, Bilbo Baggins. I'm not sure I have any longtime readers on this blog or even any regular readers, but if I do, you might remember the early posts about me wanting him to play Bilbo. Way before I even had a blog, I wanted Freeman to play Bilbo. I still can't believe it's actually happening, and I think we're all so very fortunate to get to see it. Ian Holm was great as an older Bilbo, but when it comes to a younger Bilbo, I can't think of anyone who could do the job better than Martin Freeman.
I have no problem with The Hobbit being three movies now. I just really don't see a downside to that, and I don't understand what has so many people upset. As for material being added to the movie that wasn't fully explored in the book, I'm really looking forward to seeing the White Council. For me, one of the most exciting aspects of seeing that is getting to see Christopher Lee play Saruman before his corruption.
I know there has been a lot of criticism about the format the movie was released in. I've put a lot of thought into how I want to see it, and I am planning on seeing it in 3D and 48 fps. Mainly, my decision comes down to artist intent. And much like when I saw Avatar in 3D, I feel it's something I have to experience on my own to decide whether or not I like it rather than to trust other moviegoers who have different tastes to tell me how I should see it. I'm thinking of it as an experiment or even an adventure.
Clerks III open for business.
For a while now, it hasn't been a secret that filmmaker Kevin Smith, best known for his View Askewniverse series of movies (in which he also plays the character Silent Bob), was planning on retiring from writing/directing feature films to focus on working in other forms of media. His last movie was going to be a hockey movie called Hit Somebody, but that is now going to be a six-part television miniseries instead.
With Hit Somebody no longer being a feature film, the other day, Smith announced on his Twitter account that his last movie will be a third Clerks movie:
For those that don't know, Jeff Anderson is the actor who plays the character Randal Graves in several of the View Askewniverse movies, starting with the first Clerks. From what I've heard, Smith had to do a lot of convincing to get Anderson to be in Clerks II. Since Randal Graves and Dante Hicks (played by Brian O'Halloran) are the main characters in the Clerks movies, obviously a sequel couldn't be made without them.
I don't know about how Anderson feels, but I'm pretty excited about Clerks III. Not being that interested in hockey movies made it seem pretty anticlimactic to me personally for Smith's final movie to be one. I'm glad he's still getting to tell that story, but I'm also glad there will be a third Clerks movie. It's much more fitting as his cinematic grand finale, and I'd just love to see what Dante, Randal, Jay, Silent Bob, and even Elias are up to these days.
Although I don't love every aspect of Clerks II, I think it was a great sequel, and it had some really amazing parts. I know it might sound silly since I'm talking about movies containing jokes about dicks and donkey shows, but something I really love about Smith's movies are the really beautiful and emotional scenes that explore concepts like love and friendship. The jail cell scene in Clerks II is one of my favorites in all of Smith's movies, up there with Silent Bob's Chasing Amy monologue. I'm not at all ashamed to say it makes me cry every time I see it. If Clerks III has the same amount of heart, I can't imagine not loving the movie.
Aside from all that, I realized my post about the idea of Alec Baldwin having a cameo as the live-action Leonardo Leonardo is relevant again, and I'd still love to see that happen. It might be cool to see some of the other characters show up too. Brodie, Steve-Dave, Fanboy, etc. Maybe Ben Affleck could be in there somewhere too. He was da bomb in Phantoms, yo.
With Hit Somebody no longer being a feature film, the other day, Smith announced on his Twitter account that his last movie will be a third Clerks movie:
KEVIN SMITH
So with the Hit Somebody shift, the minute Jeff Anderson signs on, my
last cinematic effort as a writer/director will be Clerks III.
last cinematic effort as a writer/director will be Clerks III.
For those that don't know, Jeff Anderson is the actor who plays the character Randal Graves in several of the View Askewniverse movies, starting with the first Clerks. From what I've heard, Smith had to do a lot of convincing to get Anderson to be in Clerks II. Since Randal Graves and Dante Hicks (played by Brian O'Halloran) are the main characters in the Clerks movies, obviously a sequel couldn't be made without them.
I don't know about how Anderson feels, but I'm pretty excited about Clerks III. Not being that interested in hockey movies made it seem pretty anticlimactic to me personally for Smith's final movie to be one. I'm glad he's still getting to tell that story, but I'm also glad there will be a third Clerks movie. It's much more fitting as his cinematic grand finale, and I'd just love to see what Dante, Randal, Jay, Silent Bob, and even Elias are up to these days.
Although I don't love every aspect of Clerks II, I think it was a great sequel, and it had some really amazing parts. I know it might sound silly since I'm talking about movies containing jokes about dicks and donkey shows, but something I really love about Smith's movies are the really beautiful and emotional scenes that explore concepts like love and friendship. The jail cell scene in Clerks II is one of my favorites in all of Smith's movies, up there with Silent Bob's Chasing Amy monologue. I'm not at all ashamed to say it makes me cry every time I see it. If Clerks III has the same amount of heart, I can't imagine not loving the movie.
Aside from all that, I realized my post about the idea of Alec Baldwin having a cameo as the live-action Leonardo Leonardo is relevant again, and I'd still love to see that happen. It might be cool to see some of the other characters show up too. Brodie, Steve-Dave, Fanboy, etc. Maybe Ben Affleck could be in there somewhere too. He was da bomb in Phantoms, yo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)